ListedTech
  • Data Portals
    • Portal for Industry
    • Portal for Institutions
    • Webinars
  • Product Categories & Reports
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Documentation
    • Webinars
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Data Overview
    • Traditional IT Research vs. ListEdTech
    • In the Media
    • Contact Us

Search the website...

Go to Portal
Posted on November 23, 2020 | by Justin Ménard

Online Program Management Systems: Still an Emerging Market

MOOCs
OPMs by the Numbers - LisTedTECH

Note to add emphasis: The data below is looking at all types of programs: microprograms, certificates, and full programs like bachelors, master, and Ph.D.

While several things seems to have been put on hold in 2020, the Online Program Management Systems (OPMs) have not been. Last week (November 18, 2020), Joshua Kim, Director of Online Programs and Strategy at the Dartmouth Center for the Advancement of Learning, published a blog post on his read-through highlights of the 2U Transparency Report (published on the same day). We believe it’s a good time to look into some of our data and update our graphs on OPM Systems.

* This graph includes all types of programs: microprograms, certificates or full programs.

As you can see from the graph, this product category has changed drastically since 2002. Led by a few companies until 2010, it saw an explosion of new players since 2014. The OPM market is a very diverse one (as most of the players have 50 product implementations or less) but also a fairly young one (as several of the companies were established in the past five years). The main companies in this product category are The Learning House, Academic Partnerships, EdX, Pearson, and 2U. These five competitors retain more than 60% of the whole OPM market. Outside the data analytics, we can mention that this product category saw some acquisitions in the past two years:

  • The Learning House (the biggest player) was acquired by Wiley Education Services (2018)

  • 2U Announces Partnership and Stake in Keypath (2019)

  • Noodle buys assets of HotChalk HotChalk (2020)

Looking at the graph above, The Learning House and Academic Partnerships have both an average of more than 10 programs per implementation and placed themselves on the peripheries of the 3.7 program per implementation trend line. If we look at those under the trend line, we see John Wiley (just under 2), Pearson (just over 2), 2U (about 2.5), and Noodle (just over 1). Even if they are below the trend line, three out of the four have contracts with more than 50 institutions (John Wiley having nearly 90).

This New Clients graph shows the number of new clients signed every year. It is important to note that if an institution signed a contract with an OPM company in 2010, any new future programs with the same company will not count as we only count first-time clients for whom we have implementation dates. As mentioned before, this clearly shows the increasing number of HigherEd institutions signing up with OPM companies, especially since 2015.

As the pandemic continues, more people choose to study online either for a few courses or for an entire program. It will be interesting to follow the group of smaller players to see what they become: stronger with more clients, being bought by larger competitors, or simply vanishing with time. One thing is certain, OPMs are there to stay.

Note: The data is for all countries in our database. Some of the graphs are based on the implementation dates for about 70% of the over 2,300 listed OPMs in this category.

Post navigation

Anthology: a Collection of 14 Different Products Under Three HigherEd IT Companies
How Salesforce is Diversifying
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
  • CAPTCHA image

    * All fields are required.

  • Listen to Our Podcast


  • Recent Posts

    • Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders? October 15, 2025
    • Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus October 1, 2025
    • Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech September 24, 2025
    • Thesis: From Unit4 Spin‑Off to SIS Specialist September 17, 2025
    • How Institutions Discover What Tech Their Peers Are Using September 3, 2025

Stay in the know…

Blog & News
Higher Ed Market Data

Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?

This year, I’ve been revisiting some of the classic business books: Blue Ocean Shift, Free, The Innovator’s Dilemma, Zero to One, and of course, Crossing the Chasm. That last one really got me thinking about early adopters. In tech markets, they’re the people (or in HigherEd, the institutions) who are comfortable taking risks, trying something new, and shaping the market ... Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?  Read More
Market Data Market Movements

Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus

September 2025 marked a major turning point for Anthology, the owner of Blackboard and several other higher education technology platforms. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. after efforts to sell itself or parts of its business outside of court failed. The filing is not a liquidation. Instead, it is a structured reorganization designed to ... Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus  Read More
ListEdTech Market Data

Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech

Market saturation is a concept we often discuss at ListEdTech because it comes up frequently with our clients. Investors want to know if a market still has room to grow, while startups want to understand whether they are entering a space with opportunities or one that is already crowded. Last year, we explored saturation by ... Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech  Read More
Footer Logo - LisTedTECH
  • Contact Us
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use